Christoph Hauert
Research Classification
Research Interests
Relevant Thesis-Based Degree Programs
Affiliations to Research Centres, Institutes & Clusters
Biography
Professor of Mathematical Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Recruitment
Complete these steps before you reach out to a faculty member!
- Familiarize yourself with program requirements. You want to learn as much as possible from the information available to you before you reach out to a faculty member. Be sure to visit the graduate degree program listing and program-specific websites.
- Check whether the program requires you to seek commitment from a supervisor prior to submitting an application. For some programs this is an essential step while others match successful applicants with faculty members within the first year of study. This is either indicated in the program profile under "Admission Information & Requirements" - "Prepare Application" - "Supervision" or on the program website.
- Identify specific faculty members who are conducting research in your specific area of interest.
- Establish that your research interests align with the faculty member鈥檚 research interests.
- Read up on the faculty members in the program and the research being conducted in the department.
- Familiarize yourself with their work, read their recent publications and past theses/dissertations that they supervised. Be certain that their research is indeed what you are hoping to study.
- Compose an error-free and grammatically correct email addressed to your specifically targeted faculty member, and remember to use their correct titles.
- Do not send non-specific, mass emails to everyone in the department hoping for a match.
- Address the faculty members by name. Your contact should be genuine rather than generic.
- Include a brief outline of your academic background, why you are interested in working with the faculty member, and what experience you could bring to the department. The supervision enquiry form guides you with targeted questions. Ensure to craft compelling answers to these questions.
- Highlight your achievements and why you are a top student. Faculty members receive dozens of requests from prospective students and you may have less than 30 seconds to pique someone鈥檚 interest.
- Demonstrate that you are familiar with their research:
- Convey the specific ways you are a good fit for the program.
- Convey the specific ways the program/lab/faculty member is a good fit for the research you are interested in/already conducting.
- Be enthusiastic, but don鈥檛 overdo it.
G+PS regularly provides virtual sessions that focus on admission requirements and procedures and tips how to improve your application.
听
ADVICE AND INSIGHTS FROM 亚洲天堂 FACULTY ON REACHING OUT TO SUPERVISORS
These videos contain some general advice from faculty across 亚洲天堂 on finding and reaching out to a potential thesis supervisor.
Supervision Enquiry
Graduate Student Supervision
Doctoral Student Supervision
Dissertations completed in 2010 or later are listed below. Please note that there is a 6-12 month delay to add the latest dissertations.
Evolutionary game theory is a popular framework for modeling the evolution of populations via natural selection. The fitness of a genetic or cultural trait often depends on the composition of the population as a whole and cannot be determined by looking at just the individual ("player") possessing the trait. This frequency-dependent fitness is quite naturally modeled using game theory since a player's trait can be encoded by a strategy and their fitness can be computed using the payoffs from a sequence of interactions with other players. However, there is often a distinct trade-off between the biological relevance of a game and the ease with which one can analyze an evolutionary process defined by a game. The goal of this thesis is to broaden the scope of some evolutionary games by removing restrictive assumptions in several cases. Specifically, we consider multiplayer games; asymmetric games; games with a continuous range of strategies (rather than just finitely many); and alternating games. Moreover, we study the symmetries of an evolutionary process and how they are influenced by the environment and individual-level interactions. Finally, we present a mathematical framework that encompasses many of the standard stochastic evolutionary processes and provides a setting in which to study further extensions of stochastic models based on natural selection.
Master's Student Supervision
Theses completed in 2010 or later are listed below. Please note that there is a 6-12 month delay to add the latest theses.
The prevalence of cooperative behavior is a fundamental problem in evolutionary biology. Because cooperative behaviors impose a cost, cooperative individuals are vulnerable to exploitation by Defectors that do not contribute and instead benefit from the cooperation of others. The bacteriophage 蠒6 shows strategies of cooperation and defection during infection. While replicating inside a host cell, 蠒6 viruses produce essential proteins in the host cell cytoplasm. Because coinfection is possible, a virus does not have exclusive access to its own products. Cooperators viruses produce products while Defector viruses produce less and instead steal from Cooperators. Previous work found that 蠒6 is trapped in the prisoner鈥檚 dilemma, predicting that Defectors will replicate faster than Cooperators and out-compete them; cooperation is doomed. Still, cooperative 蠒6 exist, so there must be a mechanism that maintains cooperation. Defectors are advantaged when coinfection is common and there is ample opportunity to extort Cooperators. However, this advantage wanes when coinfection is less common, and Cooperators are advantaged when single infection is common. The rates of single infection and coinfection are modulated by the densities of hosts and viruses. We propose that environmental feedback, or the interplay between viral and host densities, might maintain cooperation in 蠒6 populations. We develop and analyze a mathematical model that incorporates environmental feedback and find that for many parameter combinations, environmental feedback leads to the co-existence of Cooperators and Defectors.
From the microscopic to the macroscopic level, biological life exhibits directed migration in response to environmental conditions. Chemotaxis enables microbes to sense and move towards nutrient-rich regions or to avoid toxic ones. Socio-economic factors drive human populations from rural to urban areas. However, migration affects the quantity and quality of desirable resources. The effect of collective movement is especially significant when in response to the generation of public goods. Microbial communities can, for instance, alter their environment through the secretion of extracellular substances. Some substances provide antibiotic-resistance, others provide access to nutrients or promote motility. However, in all cases the maintenance of such public goods requires costly cooperation and is consequently susceptible to exploitation. The threat of exploitation becomes even more acute with motile individuals as defectors can avoid the consequences of their cheating. Here, we propose a model to investigate the effects of targeted migration based on the production of ecological public goods and analyze the interplay between social conflicts and migration. In particular, individuals can locate attractive regions by moving towards higher cooperator densities or avoid unattractive regions by moving away from defectors. Both migration patterns not only shape an individual's immediate environment but also affects the population as a whole. For example, defectors hunting cooperators in search of the public good have a homogenizing effect on population densities. They limit the production of the public good and hence inhibit the growth of the population. In contrast, aggregating cooperators promote the spontaneous formation of heterogeneous density distributions. The positive feedback between cooperator aggregation and public goods production, however, poses analytical and numerical challenges due to its tendency to develop discontinuous distributions. Thus, different modes of directed migration bear the potential to enhance or inhibit the emergence of complex and sometimes dynamic spatial arrangements. Interestingly, whenever patterns emerge in the form of heterogeneous density distributions, cooperation is promoted, on average, population densities rise, and the risk of extinction is reduced.
Population structures can be crucial determinants of evolutionary processes. For the spatial Moran process certain structures suppress selective pressure, while others amplify it (Lieberman et al. 2005 Nature 433 312-316). Evolutionary amplifiers suppress random drift and enhance selection. Recently, some results for the most powerful known evolutionary amplifier, the superstar, have been invalidated by a counter example (Diaz et al. 2013 Proc. R. Soc. A 469 20130193). Here we correct the original proof and derive improved upper and lower bounds, which indicate that the fixation probability remains close to 1-1/ r鈦 H for population size N 鈫 鈭 and structural parameter H > 1. This correction resolves the differences between the two aforementioned papers. We also confirm that in the limit N,H 鈫 鈭 superstars remain capable of providing arbitrarily strong selective advantages to any beneficial mutation, eliminating random drift. In addition, we investigate the robustness of amplification in superstars,and find that it appears to be a fragile phenomenon with respect to changes in the selection or mutation processes.
The inclusion of spatial structure in biological models has revealed important phenomenon not observed in 鈥渨ell-mixed鈥 populations. In particular, cooperation may evolve in a network-structured population whereas it cannot in a well-mixed population. However, the success of cooperators is very sensitive to small details of the model architecture. In Chapter 1 I investigate two popular biologically-motivated models of evolution in finite populations: Death-Birth (DB) and Birth-Death (BD) processes. Under DB cooperation may be favoured, while under BD it never is. In both cases reproduction is proportional to fitness and death is random; the only difference is the order of the two events at each time step. Whether structure can promote the evolution of cooperation should not hinge on a somewhat artificial ordering of birth and death. I propose a mixed rule where in each time step DB (BD) is used with probability 未 (1 鈭 未). I then derive the conditions for selection favouring cooperation under the mixed rule for all social dilemmas. The only qualitatively different outcome occurs when using just BD (未 = 0). This case admits a natural interpretation in terms of kin competition counterbalancing the effect of kin selection. Finally I show that, for any mixed BD-DB update and under weak selection, cooperation is never inhibited by population structure for any social dilemma.Chapter 2 addresses the Competitive Exclusion Principle: the maximum number of species that can coexist is the number of habitat types (Hardin, 1960). This idea was borne out in island models, where each island represents a different well-mixed niche, with migration between islands. A specialist dominates each niche. However, these models assumed equal migration between each pair of islands, and their results are not robust to changing that assumption. D茅barre and Lenormand (2011) numerically studied a two-niche model with local migration. At the boundary between niches, generalists may stably persist. The number of coexisting species may be much greater than the number of habitat types. Here, I derive the conditions for invasion of a generalist using an asymptotic approach. The prediction performs well (compared with numerical results) even for not asymptotically small parameter values (i.e. epsilon 鈮 1).
Publications
- (2021)
PLOS Computational Biology, 17 (11), e1009611 - (2021)
PLOS Computational Biology, 17 (2), e1008733 - (2021)
- (2021)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (42) - (2020)
- (2019)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286 (1910), 20191425 - (2019)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 462, 347--360 - (2019)
PLOS Computational Biology, - (2019)
Scientific Reports, - (2018)
- (2018)
Theoretical Population Biology, 121, 72--84 - (2017)
Theoretical Population Biology, 113, 13-22 - (2016)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (13), 3573--3578 - (2016)
Theoretical Population Biology, 111, 28-42 - (2016)
Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31 (1), 54-66 - (2016)
Journal of Mathematical Biology, 72 (1-2), 203-238 - (2016)
PLoS ONE, 11 (1) - (2015)
PLoS Computational Biology, 11 (8) - (2015)
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 91 (1) - (2015)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 382, 44-56 - (2015)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112 (29), 9064-9069 - (2015)
Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12 (111) - (2014)
PLoS Computational Biology, 10 (4) - (2014)
Journal of Statistical Physics, 156 (4), 739-759 - (2014)
Scientific Reports, 4 - (2014)
Nature Communications, 5 - (2013)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 336, 240-241 - (2013)
PLoS ONE, 8 (1) - (2013)
PLoS Computational Biology, 9 (12) - (2013)
Nature Climate Change, 3 (12), 1025-1028 - (2012)
Communicative & Integrative Biology, 5 (2), 209-13 - (2012)
Nature Communications, 3 - (2012)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 106-112 - (2012)
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 85 (4) - (2011)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 268 (1), 30-38 - (2011)
Journal of Mathematical Biology, 63 (1), 109-123 - (2011)
Biology Letters, 7 (6), 899-901 - (2011)
Dynamic Games and Applications, 1 (1), 149-171 - (2010)
Biological Theory, 5 (1), 3--6 - (2010)
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20 (2), 203-217 - (2010)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266 (3), 358-366 - (2010)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 267 (1), 22-28 - (2010)
Nature, 466 (7308), 861-863 - (2010)
Reviews of Nonlinear Dynamics and Complexity, 2, 25-61 - (2009)
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 79 (4) - (2009)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (3), 709-712 - (2009)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (19), 7910-7914 - (2008)
Theoretical Population Biology, 73 (2), 257-263 - (2008)
NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics, , 11-44 - (2008)
Biology Theory, 3 (2), 114-122 - (2008)
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 78 (2) - (2008)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 250 (4), 634-641 - (2007)
Science, 316 (5833), 1905-1907 - (2006)
Nature, 441 (7092), 502-505 - (2006)
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 74 (1) - Cooperation, collectives formation and specialization (2006)
Advances in Complex Systems, 9 (4), 315-335 - (2006)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273 (1605), 3131-3132 - (2006)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273 (1600), 2565-2570 - (2006)
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19 (5), 1386-1388 - (2006)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 (2), 495-497 - (2006)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 240 (4), 627-636 - (2006)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239 (2), 195-202 - (2005)
Physical Review Letters, 95 (23) - (2005)
Nature, 433 (7023), 312-316 - (2005)
American Journal of Physics, 73 (5), 405-414 - (2005)
Ecology Letters, 8 (7), 748-766 - (2004)
Journal of Statistical Physics, 116 (5-6), 1453-1469 - (2004)
Nature Materials, 428 (6983), 643-646 - (2004)
Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series B, 4 (3), 575-587 - (2004)
Science, 306 (5697), 859-862 - (2003)
Complexity, 8 (4 SPE), 31-38 - (2003)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270 (1519), 1099-1104 - (2002)
Current Biology, 12 (8), R270--R272 - (2002)
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering, 12 (7), 1531-1548 - (2002)
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 66 (6) - (2002)
Phys. Rev. Lett., 89 (11) - (2002)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218 (2), 187-194 - (2002)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218 (3), 261-272 - (2002)
Science, 296 (5570), 1129-1132 - (2001)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268 (1468), 761-769 - (2001)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98 (19), 10757-10762 - (1999)
Phys. Rev. E, 60 (3), 2706--2709 - (1998)
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 192 (2), 155-166 - (1997)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264 (1381), 513--519
If this is your researcher profile you can log in to the portal to update your details and provide recruitment preferences.